tree.gif (2094 bytes) 

Article: Remedies for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Article: Connecticut version of Remedies article

Article: Arizona - "Florez Revisited: Arizona's New Approach to Extending Statutes of Limitation in Childhood Sexual Abuse Cases"

Legal Resources for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Susan K. Smith
David M. Moore

Attorneys at Law

Mediation, Collaboration
Victims' Remedies
Injury Cases

Smith & Moore, LLC
www.SmithMooreLLC.com
smith-lawfirm.com

24 East Main Street
(Route 44)
Old Avon Village North
Avon, CT 06001
Direct dial:

Atty. Smith:  (860) 678-1860
Atty. Moore: (860) 674-0122

Fax: (860) 677-5229
Directions & Map

Atty. Smith's Hartford
Conference Space
21 Oak Street
Suite 208
Hartford, CT 06106
Directions & Map

Martindale-Hubbell
Peer Review Rated
For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability

scale inki.gif (1541 bytes)

The Fine Print: This web site provides general information only and cannot be relied upon as legal advice. Laws change  and differ from State to State. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. You should consult an attorney about your particular situation.

COPYRIGHT © 1998-09 Susan K. Smith All Rights Reserved.

 

 


Statutes of Limitations
for Child Sexual Abuse

Maryland

  Section 5-117 of the Maryland Annotated Code was signed into law in May of 2003. The statute is effective October 1, 2003.

Civil damage suits for persons who suffered abuse as minors may be brought within 7 years of the date of reaching their age of majority.  The statute specifically provides, however, that it shall not be used to revive any cases that were barred prior to the passage of the new limitation period.

Link to text of bill (may be temporary).

As of 1997, courts have refused to recognize a delayed discovery rule. In Doe v. Archdiocese of Washington, 114 Md.App. 169, 689 A.2d 634 (Md.App. 1997) the court held (1) child sexual abuse victim's cause of action against priests accrued, for statute of limitations purposes, upon date he attained majority, regardless of when he first appreciated wrongfulness of priests' alleged actions; (2) plaintiff's alleged failure to appreciate wrongfulness of priests' alleged misconduct did not rise to level of "mental incompetence," of kind sufficient to toll statute of limitations); Doe v. Maskell, 342 Md. 684, 679 A.2d 1087 (1996) cert. denied 117 S. Ct. 770 (1997) (refusing to apply insanity tolling to repressed memory).

Resources:

Maryland Coalition Against Sexual Assault - Includes reports of Legislative Activity

Maryland Statutes

Reviewed 08/25/2007