tree.gif (2094 bytes) 

Article: Remedies for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Article: Connecticut version of Remedies article

Legal Resources for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Susan K. Smith
David M. Moore

Attorneys at Law

Mediation, Collaboration
Victims' Remedies
Injury Cases

Smith & Moore, LLC
www.SmithMooreLLC.com
smith-lawfirm.com

24 East Main Street
(Route 44)
Old Avon Village North
Avon, CT 06001
Direct dial:

Atty. Smith:  (860) 678-1860
Atty. Moore: (860) 674-0122

Fax: (860) 677-5229
Directions & Map

Atty. Smith's Hartford
Conference Space
21 Oak Street
Suite 208
Hartford, CT 06106
Directions & Map

Martindale-Hubbell
Peer Review Rated
For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability

 


Statutes of Limitations
for Child Sexual Abuse

North Carolina

General discovery statute (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-52(16)(1993)) and general incompetency tolling provision (§ 1-17(a)(1993)). Incompetency tolling: within 3 years of the removal of the incompetency or reaching age 18.

Statutory discovery tolling: actions accrue when the bodily harm becomes apparent or ought reasonable to have become apparent to the claimant. Section 1-52 (16) provides:

Unless otherwise provided by statute, for personal injury or physical damage to claimant's property, the cause of action, except in causes of actions referred to in G.S. 1-15(c), shall not accrue until bodily harm to the claimant or physical damage to his property becomes apparent or ought reasonably to have become apparent to the claimant, whichever event first occurs. Provided that no cause of action shall accrue more than 10 years from the last act or omission of the defendant giving rise to the cause of action.
 

In Soderlund v. Kuch, the Court strictly interpreted the  discovery provision and barred a victim's claim because the victim's conditions and their relation to the abuse could have been diagnosed by a professional within several years of the abuse. The Court concluded:

The primary purpose of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-52(16) is that it is intended to apply to plaintiffs with latent injuries. Specifically, § 1-52(16) protects a potential plaintiff in the case of a latent injury by providing that a cause of action does not accrue until the injured party becomes aware or should reasonably have become aware of the existence of the injury. As soon as the injury becomes apparent to the claimant or should reasonably become apparent, the cause of action is complete and the limitation period begins to run.

Soderlund v. Kuch, 143 N.C. App. 361, 370, 546 S.E.2d 632, 638; disc. rev. denied, 353 N.C. 729, 551 S.E.2d 438-39 (2001).
 

Last Update: 08/25/2007