tree.gif (2094 bytes) 

Article: Remedies for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Article: Connecticut version of Remedies article

Article: Arizona - "Florez Revisited: Arizona's New Approach to Extending Statutes of Limitation in Childhood Sexual Abuse Cases"

Legal Resources for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Susan K. Smith
David M. Moore

Attorneys at Law

Mediation, Collaboration
Victims' Remedies
Injury Cases

Smith & Moore, LLC
www.SmithMooreLLC.com
smith-lawfirm.com

24 East Main Street
(Route 44)
Old Avon Village North
Avon, CT 06001
Direct dial:

Atty. Smith:  (860) 678-1860
Atty. Moore: (860) 674-0122

Fax: (860) 677-5229
Directions & Map

Atty. Smith's Hartford
Conference Space
21 Oak Street
Suite 208
Hartford, CT 06106
Directions & Map

Martindale-Hubbell
Peer Review Rated
For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability

scale inki.gif (1541 bytes)This is a  Survivors' Law and Advocates Webring site. To advance to other sites in the web ring: [Skip Prev] [Prev] [Next] [Skip Next] [Random] [Next 5] [ListSites]

 


Statutes of Limitations
for Child Sexual Abuse

Help us to keep these pages current. Report new
legal developments, bad links, etc. to

Utah

Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-25.1 A person must file a civil action for intentional or negligent sexual abuse suffered as a child:

(a) within four years after the person attains the age of 18 years; or

(b) if a person discovers sexual abuse only after attaining the age of 18 years, that person may bring a civil action for such sexual abuse within four years after discovery of the sexual abuse, whichever period expires later. ["Discovery" means when a person knows or reasonably should know that the injury or illness was caused by the intentional or negligent sexual abuse.]

A civil action may be brought only against a living person who intentionally perpetrated the sexual abuse or negligently permitted the sexual abuse to occur.

Utah courts have allowed only narrow and limited application of the statutory discovery provisions.

In Olsen v. Hooley, 865 P.2d 1345 (Utah 1993), the Utah Supreme Court held that the "exceptional circumstances" provision of the state discovery rule is applicable to a "totally repressed" memory case. The limitations period begins to run at the point the plaintiff recalls the abuse. Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake City, 865 P.2d at 1350 (UT 2007 UT).

See also Burkholz v. Joyce, 972 P.2d 1235
(Utah 1998) (refusing to apply discovery rule when Plaintiff had knowledge of the claim at age 19).

In Franklin v. Stevenson, 1987 P.2d 22 (Utah 1999) the court reversed a jury verdict and ruled that repressed memory testimony should not have been admitted at trial because its scientific reliability was not established in the trial court.

Link to Utah Statutes/Code

This page last reviewed August 25, 2007