tree.gif (2094 bytes) 

Article: Remedies for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Article: Connecticut version of Remedies article

Legal Resources for Victims of Sexual Abuse

Susan K. Smith
David M. Moore

Attorneys at Law

Mediation, Collaboration
Victims' Remedies
Injury Cases

Smith & Moore, LLC
www.SmithMooreLLC.com
smith-lawfirm.com

24 East Main Street
(Route 44)
Old Avon Village North
Avon, CT 06001
Direct dial:

Atty. Smith:  (860) 678-1860
Atty. Moore: (860) 674-0122

Fax: (860) 677-5229
Directions & Map

Atty. Smith's Hartford
Conference Space
21 Oak Street
Suite 208
Hartford, CT 06106
Directions & Map

Martindale-Hubbell
Peer Review Rated
For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability

scale inki.gif (1541 bytes)

The Fine Print: This web site provides general information only and cannot be relied upon as legal advice. Laws change  and differ from State to State. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. You should consult an attorney about your particular situation.

COPYRIGHT © 1998-09 Susan K. Smith All Rights Reserved.

 

 


Statutes of Limitations
for Child Sexual Abuse

West Virginia

W. Va. Code §55-2-15. West Virginia has not adopted any special bright-line rules for childhood sexual abuse (CSA) cases. A victim who was a minor at the time of the sexual abuse, must file: 1) within two years he/she has attained age of majority and 2) within twenty years of date of wrongful act and injury.

Discovery and disability rule applies to all injury claims. The victim must demonstrate he or she was prevented from knowing of the claim at the time of the injury by reason of fraudulent concealment, inability to comprehend the injury, or other extreme hardship. Cart v. Marcum, 188 W.Va. 241, 423 S.E.2d 644 (1992). In Miller v. Mongolia County Bd. of Ed., 210 W. Va. 147, 556 S.E.2d 427 (2001), the State Supreme Court held that a cover-up by Board of Education was  sufficient to trigger the fraudulent concealment exception.

The West Virginia courts have applied the discovery rule set forth in Gaither v. City Hospital to sexual abuse claims advanced under a discovery analysis. The Court Gaither Court ruled that

[i]n tort actions, unless there is a clear statutory prohibition to its application, under the discovery rule the statute of limitations begins to run when the plaintiff knows, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence, should know (1) that the plaintiff has been injured, (2) the identity of the entity who owed the plaintiff a duty to act with due care, and who may have engaged in conduct that breached that duty, and (3) that the conduct of that entity has a causal relation to the injury.

199 W.Va. 706, 487 S.E.2d 901 (1997). Merrill v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources, slip op. 2006 W.Va. (32856) (Jan. 2006).

The discovery statute cannot be used to extend the 20-year statute of repose. Albright v. White, 202 W. Va. 292, 503 S.E.2d 860 (1998); Donley v. Bracken, 192 W. Va. 383, 387, 452 S.E.2d 699, 703 (1994).

Link to West Virginia Legislature's web site.

Last revision to this page August 25, 2007